Posted On May 1, 2016

How To Be an Atheist: Why Many Skeptics Aren’t Skeptical Enough (Mitch Stokes)

by | May 1, 2016 | Apologetics, Featured

As Christians, it is difficult to sometimes know how to move the ball forward in terms of proving the existence of God among skeptical culture. We feel that in order to defend God against atheists and agnostics, we must be well-versed in the areas of science and philosophy going into these arguments. But not only this; unfortunately, it seems that many of these arguments become immature, childish name-calling from one side to the other, and vice versa. If we ever want to progress towards truth, towards knowledge, then we must be willing to have these conversations honestly. We must desire to put the bomb-throwing aside for a bit and honestly evaluate our belief systems.

That is what Mitch Stokes seeks to do in his new book How to Be an Atheist. Stokes’s agenda is not to harp on unbelievers as “delusional” and “not great,” treating them with contempt, but simply trying to show the skepticism we should have about skepticism itself. The “New Atheists,” Stokes argues, ought to also remove themselves from the bullhorn and take a moment to see their inconsistencies with their patterns of belief. As Stokes will point out, these skeptics may not be as skeptical as they make themselves out to be.

The book seems daunting to many. Reading 240 pages about the Enlightenment, Hume, Newtonian Physics, consequentialism, and Dostoyevsky may not be your normal choice, but rest assured, How to Be an Atheist is well-written. One of Stokes’s key strengths is his ability to bring abstract or advanced terminology to the ground level. I’m by no means a philosophy or psychology student, but I felt it was easy to grasp the concepts outlined in the book. It never felt intimidating to read, as Stokes has a way of combining wit with wisdom (he even relies on comic strips throughout the book to make some points!).

The outline of the book is simple. Stokes spends some time discussing the fundamentals of Hume’s sense perception, and the concept of naturalism. After doing this in Part 1, he spends Part 2 discussing the futility of science to disprove God altogether, and Part 3 outlining that even if science could, the root inconsistency found in skepticism is matching naturalism with morality. Where this book succeeds is that it is extremely in-depth, yet simple. It doesn’t seek to cover every area of Atheism vs. Christianity but simply shows how these two common arguments against Christianity don’t hold the water often portrayed.

I appreciate Stokes’s acknowledgment of presuppositions. Sometimes, we approach the believer vs. unbeliever argument with a purely evidential point of view and seek to determine which scale is weightier according to evidence. But Stokes, like a horde of solid theologians and philosophers, knows that “the beliefs we have strongly influence the beliefs we form” (90). Regardless, Stokes is not afraid to take on some of skepticism’s most recognized “weapons” against theism, such as superstring theory, Sam Harris’s all-natural morality theory, and theories altogether!

Skeptics and Christians alike should take some time to read Stokes’s new book, because it desires that we be consistent in our beliefs, whatever they are, and illustrates our need to return to the arguments themselves instead of relying on being volatile towards those of other beliefs. Stokes’s research and thought is chock full of illustrations and metaphors to make the material easily understandable and logical. I appreciate his willingness to take on such a task and know I will benefit from it in future conversations I have with skeptics.

Related Posts

9 Wrong Ways to Read the Bible (And One Better Way)

9 Wrong Ways to Read the Bible (And One Better Way)

A Book of Good News Many of us approach the Bible not as oxygenating, but as suffocating. We see the Bible lying there on the end table. We know we should open it. Sometimes we do. But it is usually with a sense of begrudged duty. Life is demanding enough, we think....

You Shall Not Eat

You Shall Not Eat

Genesis 2:15-17, “The Lord God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to work it and keep it. 16 And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, “You may surely eat of every tree of the garden, 17 but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not...

What We Know About the Created Universe

What We Know About the Created Universe

On today’s episode, a listener writes in and asks Dave, “Do we know what God was doing before He created the universe?” What You'll Hear on this Episode The Fellowship of the Trinity. Planned Redemption and Glorification. Planning His Kingdom. The Christian’s Destiny...

The Demands of Justice and Truth

The Demands of Justice and Truth

Genesis 2:15-17, “15 The Lord God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to work it and keep it. 16 And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, “You may surely eat of every tree of the garden, 17 but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not...

0 Comments

Share8
Tweet1
Email
Reddit
Share