#29: To Kill David[Sermon]

Join Dave as he continues our 1 Samuel series looking at 1 Samuel 19:1-24.

Theological Retrieval for Evangelicals: Why We Need Our Past to Have a Future – Gavin Ortlund

Interest among evangelicals in the Protestant Reformation has been on the rise for several years. With the recent quatercentenary commemoration of the Reformation, interest continues to blaze hotter than ever. Gavin Ortlund, himself a student of the Reformation,...

The Connection Between The Incarnation and The High Priestly Ministry of Jesus

On today's episode, a listener writes in today and asks Dave, “What is the connection between the Incarnation and the High Priestly Ministry of Jesus?" What you’ll hear in this episode Anselm of Canterbury on the Incarnation Hebrews 2:17-18 and the Incarnation. The...

What Happened on the Cross?

Sin has separated man from God, and the only way of reconciliation is through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. His life, death, and resurrection have made it possible for sinful humanity to be restored to God. But, why is the cross necessary? What happened on the cross...

Bearing the Marks of Jesus

Galatians 6:17–18, “From now on let no one cause me trouble, for I bear on my body the marks of Jesus. 18 The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit, brothers. Amen.” Far from a dispassionate treatise on justification, Paul’s epistle to the Galatians is...

What Advent Is All About

The Coming of Christ Even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many. (Mark 10:45) Christmas is about the coming of Christ into the world. It’s about the Son of God, who existed eternally with the Father as “the...
Apostles, Paul’s View of the Apostles, Servants of Grace
Paul’s View of the Apostles

Posted On September 24, 2019

Galatians 2:6, “And from those who seemed to be influential (what they were makes no difference to me; God shows no partiality)—those, I say, who seemed influential added nothing to me.”

First Peter 3:15–16 admonishes us to be prepared to “make a defense to anyone” who asks for a reason for our hope. Though we may not all have formal theological training, all believers must equip themselves to answer skeptics.

One attack on Christianity says the New Testament is a muddle of irreconcilable viewpoints. Many claim “the Bible is full of contradictions,” and we must know how to deal with this mantra despite its lack of substantive evidence.

For example, many people believe Paul disagreed sharply with the other apostles, especially James. Galatians 2:6 is often used to support this theory because in it Paul seems to put the other apostles down. According to many English translations, Paul speaks of James, Cephas (Peter), and John (2:9) as those who “seemed influential” (v. 6), which in our English idiom can imply that Paul had doubts about these men. Yet translating the verse this way confuses the reader because this choice of words in the Greek simply means “those known to be leaders.” Paul is not denigrating the position of the three other men, and he is stating that they were acknowledged authorities in the Christian community.

Since they affirmed his message (vv. 6–9), putting down the apostles would hurt his argument for the truth of his gospel; thus, Paul cannot be questioning their status. Still, Paul does not accentuate their authority in the most direct manner possible (v. 6). Most commentators attribute this to the Galatian Judaizers’ exaltation of the Jerusalem apostles above Paul, probably due to their connection to Jesus by blood (James) or status as His first disciples (Cephas and John). These false teachers and their inordinate emphasis on the Jerusalem apostolate force Paul in this context to argue for the other apostles’ authority in a roundabout manner. Should he affirm the place of the other apostles more forthrightly, Paul might lower himself in the eyes of the Galatians.

James, Cephas, and John are essential, but Paul is no less of an apostle, and he recognizes the others indirectly and mentions God’s impartiality to make his case. John Calvin says Paul “admits that they were first in the order of time, but contends that this did not prevent him from being their equal in rank.”

Critical to Galatians 2:6 is the understanding that the Jerusalem apostles added nothing to Paul’s gospel. Paul was called later, but that did not make his preaching deficient. At any rate, in the final analysis, there are no contradictions between the biblical writings of these authors. Teachers of God’s holy Word ought to practice interpreting Scripture in light of Scripture. Pitting two writers against each other ultimately pits God against Himself.

Related Posts

Apostles, Paul’s View of the Apostles, Servants of Grace

What Happened on the Cross?

Sin has separated man from God, and the only way of reconciliation is through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. His life, death, and resurrection have made it possible for sinful humanity to be restored to God. But, why is the cross necessary? What happened on the cross...

Apostles, Paul’s View of the Apostles, Servants of Grace

Bearing the Marks of Jesus

Galatians 6:17–18, “From now on let no one cause me trouble, for I bear on my body the marks of Jesus. 18 The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit, brothers. Amen.” Far from a dispassionate treatise on justification, Paul’s epistle to the Galatians is...

Apostles, Paul’s View of the Apostles, Servants of Grace

What Advent Is All About

The Coming of Christ Even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many. (Mark 10:45) Christmas is about the coming of Christ into the world. It’s about the Son of God, who existed eternally with the Father as “the...

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share21
Tweet8
Share
Pin
Buffer